Rosetta
Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Rosetta by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.
We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.
For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.
7 results found
-
Are you worried about your PGCE Assignments?
Are you worried about your PGCE Assignments? Why to worry when there is the top PGCE assignment writing company in the UK. They make sure to get positive results. Visit there website and get free instant quote.
Website: https://www.pgceassignments.com/
1 vote -
locked
Would like an ability to remove 'locks' on IEs based on a set.
Currently i am requred to subit a case to support to get this work doine.
1 vote -
system checks
I have been running the system checks via the 'Rosetta Administration' -- when the job runs to completion you do not get an alert that the job has completed with no issues other that the 'No records were found' message
This may cause confusion especially if when accessing the 'System Checks' the message 'No records were found' is already being displayed
This is not an issue but it would be nice to get feedback that after running the system checks that no issues were found.
It may even be great to get a checkbox against each of the actions showing…
1 vote -
UX: improve list view of IE delivery rules
The IE delivery rule list contains the following fields:
- active
- name
- description
- creation date
- modification date
- commands view, edit and deletethe dates and commands take up half of the screen, not leaving much space for the name and description. Both these fields are rarely descriptive enough to fully understand the implication of the rule and we have had several occasions where an operator added a rule, changed the order or modified a rule without understanding its impact. Resulting in wrong viewers being used or even files not viewable at all.
We think the…
3 votes -
Clean-up job for operational repository file system
Currently the clean-up job removes old data from deposit storage. Clean up job should clean also Operational Repository / Storage Repository Group file system. Data related to finished SIPs or committed IEs should be remove after some period from the FS path which is configured for operational repository.
The job should not remove data in TA area.
best regards
Milan8 votes -
make passwords configurable, create password exchange infrastructure
For compliance purposes and as a lesson learned from SC 00560356, I suggest improving the documentation and configurability of passwords throughout subsystems of Rosetta installations.
I suggest creating and maintaining a KB article on how and where to change passwords for:
- System user "dps"
- System user "oracle"
- Oracle user "sys"
- default Rosetta user "admin1" (John Smith)
- Cantaloupe Image Server user "admin" (changeable by configuring ".../system.dir/thirdparty/tomcat/rosetta-webapps/cantaloupe.war/cantaloupe.properties")
- Solr user
- Rosetta console UI userThe passwords for Solr and the Rosetta console UI cannot be changed at the moment (Rosetta 5.5.0.0); I suggest considering changes to…
1 vote -
Deactivate Institution
Enable deleting an institution that had content already deposited into it. This should be enabled only if all the IEs were already deleted.
3 votesAdi Alter respondedSubmitted by Ex Libris PM on behalf of our customers
- Don't see your idea?