Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
When filtering to a certain location via facets, you often get results from other locations too, which is unexpected from patrons perspective in many cases. This is caused by the current related records setting which is also taking locations with related records into account. The display is correct for analytical records without inventory (book chapters and articles), but not for the other monographical resources.
What we wish to achieve is the following:
When the record of a book chapter, journal issue or journal article (i.e. a record containing a 773 field with $w) is viewed in Primo, the holding of the record linked via 773 $w is displayed.
When records contain a series link (8xx $w) or a related record (76x/77x/78x $w - exception: 773), we do wish to display a link to the related record (via system number), but not the related holding.
Right now, the configuration does not offer the needed flexibility.
Nikol Stepan, SLSP
shared this idea
Hi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
-
F. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne
commented
ZHB Lucerne strongly supports this request! It is incomprehensible, why filtering for a certain location delivers results where the filtered location is then not displayed in the full view. Absolutely a must have feature.