Less duplicate records in Primo Central Index results
Primo Central grouping is based on the existing FRBR workflow, including the grouping process at the database level (the way the Search engine handles grouping) and the Front End functionality. It is used to prevent duplicate records in the results list.
Unfortunately, many records are not added to FRBR groups because the system considers the metadata are not rich enough. With the increase of records provided by (Open Access) aggregators and repositories, the number of duplicate records will certainly not decrease.
Could Ex Libris improve the FRBR workflow for Primo Central records in order to reduce the number of duplicate results and consolidate the FRBR groups?
Examples of duplicate records:
Accuracy of prediction of gene content in large animal populations and its use for candidate gene detection and genetic evaluation
3 results (2 FRBR groups):
- TNproquest195858157 and TNfaoagrisUS201300875183
- TNcrossref10.3168/jds.2007-0231, TNscopus2-s2.0-42449094585, TNsciversesciencedirectelsevierS0022-0302(08)71293-1, TNmedline18349258
- TNorbi2268/23076
Linguistic symbiosis between event loop actors and threads
2 results (1 FRBR group):
- TNsciversesciencedirectelsevierS1477-8424(08)00024-9
- TNscopus2-s2.0-51649125887 and TNcrossref10.1016/j.cl.2008.06.005
Efficient control of transient wave forms to prevent spreading depolarizations
2 results (1 FRBR group):
- TNarxiv0705.3398
- TNscopus2-s2.0-39649117125, TNsciversesciencedirectelsevierS0022-5193(07)00579-6, TNcrossref10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.11.019, TNmedline18177900
Le traitement de la modalité épistémique dans les traductions françaises de On the Origin of Species de Charles Darwin
3 results:
- TNerudit1038687ar
- TNscopus2-s2.0-85017546223
- TN_proquest1870219718
Hi all,
We are moving this idea to "Closed" to release your votes, as it is no longer relevant with CDI.
Best regards,
Yael.
-
Stacey van Groll commented
This idea should be closed and community votes (currently 201) released, given PCI doesn't exist anymore and CDI doesn't use FRBR groups but instead Match & Merge.
-
François Renaville commented
Another example would be PhD thesis "Enforcing virtualized systems security" from author Hedi Benzina in 2012 that we find 3 times in our Primo FE because the thesis is available in three different activate PCI collections:
- TN_abes_s2012DENS0085 (theses.fr Open Access)
- TN_hal00846513 (HAL (Hyper Articles en Ligne))
- TN_ndltdtel-00846513 (Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations)
Obviously, FRBR process does not take author, title, year and type into account to create a FRBR group, what Normalization Rules can do with local records (Alma, Aleph...). -
Camille Mazé commented
Dissertations and thesis coming from Primo Central aren't frbrized, it would be better to group the dissertations coming from PCI like it is already done for books and articles.