1914 results found

1. Electronic Collection PO lines should appear in "More info" at bib record level when Collection is linked to bib record

   Electronic Collection PO lines should appear in "More info" at bib record level when Collection is linked to bib record
   Description Hello,

   This is an enhancement request.

   Even when an electronic collection is linked to a bibliographic record in the Additional descriptive information field of the collection record and when an Electronic Collection PO line is linked to the collection, it currently is not possible to get to the PO line when we look up the title as "All titles" and click on the "More info" link. We have to use an Electronic Collection search to get to the title and click on the "More info" link to get to the Electronic Collection PO line.

   Here is a screencast to demonstrate: http://screencast.com/t/e4S1UwEiMu6h

   Electronic Collection PO lines should appear in "More info" at bib record level when Collection is linked to bib record
   Description Hello,

   This is an enhancement request.

   Even when an electronic collection is linked to a bibliographic record in the Additional descriptive information field of the collection record and when an Electronic Collection PO line is linked to the collection, it currently is not possible to get to the PO line when we look up the title as "All titles" and click on the "More info" link. We have to use an Electronic Collection search to get to the title… more

   10 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Acquisitions - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello All,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

   This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

   We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team

2. PO Templates: allow anyone to delete

   Right now a PO template can only be deleted by the person who created it. We have a number of templates sitting in our list that were created as tests when we first adopted Alma. We can't delete them because we don't know who made them, and it's possible that the creator no longer works at our institution.

   We don't see why public templates require this level of protection; if someone is concerned about a template being deleted, they can make it private.

   We would like the ability to clean up our template list so it can actually be an efficient tool. If someone has the Alma role to make a template, they should be able to delete any public template as well.

   Naomi Maendel
   Technical Services
   University of Manitoba
   CANADA

   Right now a PO template can only be deleted by the person who created it. We have a number of templates sitting in our list that were created as tests when we first adopted Alma. We can't delete them because we don't know who made them, and it's possible that the creator no longer works at our institution.

   We don't see why public templates require this level of protection; if someone is concerned about a template being deleted, they can make it private.

   We would like the ability to clean up our template list so it can actually be an… more

   6 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello All,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

   This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

   We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team

3. Statistical Categories (Crossover between Fulfillment & Users Subject Areas

   Here is my problem. We want our statistical categories linked to Fulfillment. We want to know how many patrons pursuing a Nursing degree are checking out items from the library? Itt does us no good to have data on who is pursuing a nursing degree in the users section, but not be able to link that in the fulfillment section. Because of the design of the statistical categories and the fact that we do not have a way to import every possible degree, job ID, etc. and keep the list up-to-date as it changes, this is how we have them set up:

   We have the following statistical categorizes
   PLAN, PROGRAM, COLLEGE, DEGREE, DEPARTMENT, DEPTID, AND JOBTITLE

   We have these categories mapped into the following category types:
   DEPARTMENT, COLLEGE, JOB, PLAN-PROGRAM, DEGREE

   The actual value of these categories such as the actual degree is put in a note field. So where the actual data we need lies is the Users Section > Statistics Table > Statistical Category & Note fields. Unfortunately I don't see this info anywhere in the fulfillment section. This area is not shared with fulfillment either so you cannot get the information when linking the 2 subject areas.

   I do have the Statistical Category 1-5 fields mapped, but it actually gives you the label of Department, College, Degree, etc. and not the note field associated with these that contains the actual data.

   Having this info available in Fulfillment would be a great improvement to the system. Another way to get at this same information is when doing Patron imports allow the statistical category to be filled in with whatever value is there instead of limiting it to certain ones.

   Here is my problem. We want our statistical categories linked to Fulfillment. We want to know how many patrons pursuing a Nursing degree are checking out items from the library? Itt does us no good to have data on who is pursuing a nursing degree in the users section, but not be able to link that in the fulfillment section. Because of the design of the statistical categories and the fact that we do not have a way to import every possible degree, job ID, etc. and keep the list up-to-date as it changes, this is how we have them… more

   10 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello All,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

   This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

   We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team

4. More than one work order type per Word Order Department

   In our library, one physical location in the library handles many processes. However, we still want patrons to see a different status for each kind of work order. Right now, only one work order type (the source of the Primo Statuse) can be associated with any given work order department (the currently at location.) So, in order for our patrons to be able to tell the difference between an item at the bindery and an item being repaired in house (with their corresponding turn around time) our staff has to switch currently at locations when they switch tasks. Can you make it so that multiple work order types can be handled by a single work order department, even if this department is not the circulation desk?

   In our library, one physical location in the library handles many processes. However, we still want patrons to see a different status for each kind of work order. Right now, only one work order type (the source of the Primo Statuse) can be associated with any given work order department (the currently at location.) So, in order for our patrons to be able to tell the difference between an item at the bindery and an item being repaired in house (with their corresponding turn around time) our staff has to switch currently at locations when they switch tasks. Can you… more

   17 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  Resource Management - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello All,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

   This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

   We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team

5. E-Inventory Import Profile defect - inability to distinguish multiple services

   When setting up an electronic import profile that relies on an electronic collection with multiple services, it is unclear which service I'm selecting. Please correct or "enhance" the obvious defect and make these services distinguishable. One option would be to include the custom description field from the service level.

   •  

   5 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Resource Management - Electronic  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello All,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

   This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

   We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team

6. Provide the ability to sort the order of Resource Sharing Requests and General Electronic Services requests.

   Right now he tables which control the orders of requests in the Get It Window are currently not "interdisciplinary", which means that it is possible to sort the order of all General Electronic Services among themselves, all Online Service, etc. But it is not possible to control the complete sorting of services in the ViewIt or GetIt. Would be nice to sort together.

   9 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Resource Sharing  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello All,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

   This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

   We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team

7. Option to change item policy in batch

   User can have the option to select all the items under a holding record and change the item policy batch for them all at once.

   8 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Resource Management - Physical  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello All,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

   This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

   We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team

8. Run a "change temporary location indications" job

   This functionnality is currently available only with the "change physical item" that allows change for all item indications. Such a new job would help all librarians to change temporary locations for a set of documents avoiding the risk of errors in other item fields. With that new option, it would be possible to keep the "change physical item" job only available to ILS manager and let all librarians run the "change temporary location indications"

   14 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Resource Management - Physical  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminLiza Voloshin (Product Owner, Alma Resource Management, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello all,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than a year with fewer than 20 votes. This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the CERV process. We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team.

9. Change duplicate icons in MD editor

   In MD editor, the icons for "view bibliographic record" and "view inventory" are identical. Could one of these icons be changed?

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Metadata Management  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

   Hello All,

   This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

   This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

   We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

   Alma Product Team

10. Show editions of books when a repository search is done in either Physical Title search, or Physical Item search, not just all item search

    It's frustrating to do a physical title search or physical item search and only be showing the year of publication but not the edition, the edition only seems to show in an all item search.

    4 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Fulfillment - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

11. Add fields for Title of unit and other descriptors to the Item Record OR add radial buttons to Item record and description templates

    Currently, there is no good way to use the “Generate” button in the item record to create descriptions for supplements and indexes. In the interest of consistency, we intentionally do NOT enter the descriptions manually, which greatly improves searching and sorting of serials.
    While it is possible to have supplements and indexes list separately by creating separate records and adding the $o (unit title) to field 864 (supplements) or 865 (indexes), the holdings list does not display the unit title, so there is no visual difference between the two holdings. An 863 holding for “Aperture” and an 864 holding for “The Photobook Review” would appear identical in the list of holdings. This would also list the supplements separately from the issue to which they are a supplement in both Alma and Primo, which is undesirable. Furthermore, all holdings still draw upon the same description template table for generation of the description, which is the most useful field for distinguishing serial issues in Alma and Primo.
    At present, there is no equivalent to MARC holdings 863-865 subfield $o in the item record. (Nor is there a field for subfields n, p, or q, but I personally haven’t had a need for them as yet). In order to get the supplement title to display, it must be improperly entered into one of the enumeration fields. However, those are fields legitimately in use with other data, so any description templates must take into account both legitimate and “work around” uses for the field(s). It is virtually impossible to account for all possible values which could be used in an enumeration field, since volume numbers and issue numbers can continue indefinitely and supplement titles may differ with each issuance. Likewise, use of the generic title “supplement” is less than helpful where multiple supplements are issued (i.e. The New York Times)
    For example, right now I cannot set up a description template to simply display the text as input in $b, since most serial issues need to have that field prefixed with “no.” and I want that constant as part of the generated description coded in the template. If I just put the supplement title in $b and use the template as it works best for most issues, I get a display like “v.103:no.Book Review(Aug. 8 2016)”
    
    Adding a unit title field to the item record and including it in the generated description seems as though it would be the most efficient solution to this problem, at least from the perspective of the person receiving the issues. Supplement titles, index notation, etc., could then be placed in this field and its display could be defined in description templates without having to account for the field’s use as a volume or issue number. Using this approach would also, in theory, enable reporting, searching, and sorting supplements and indexes both with the basic units (by using the description field) or separate from them (by using the separate fields that make up the description).
    An alternate solution could be to add radial buttons to the item record indicating whether they a basic unit, a supplement, or an index and then add corresponding radial buttons to the description templates to indicate if it is applicable to one, some, or all of those issue types. In this way, I could have two templates utilizing exactly the same combination of enumeration and chronology fields, but define one to add the “no.” prefix and one to skip it. This, however, seems like a poor form, since the enumeration fields, by their very name, are designed to hold numeric data, not text. This also limits ability to report and sort supplements and indexes separately from the basic unit, since there is no distinct subfield.

    Currently, there is no good way to use the “Generate” button in the item record to create descriptions for supplements and indexes. In the interest of consistency, we intentionally do NOT enter the descriptions manually, which greatly improves searching and sorting of serials.
    While it is possible to have supplements and indexes list separately by creating separate records and adding the $o (unit title) to field 864 (supplements) or 865 (indexes), the holdings list does not display the unit title, so there is no visual difference between the two holdings. An 863 holding for “Aperture” and an 864 holding for… more

    7 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Resource Management - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

12. If user notes are marked "external" send an immediate notification to user's email

    If user notes are marked "external" send an immediate notification to user's email

    2 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Fulfillment - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

13. We would be interested in knowing if, as part of fulfillment in ALMA, there is any way to view the last few patron accounts accessed by staf

    We would be interested in knowing if, as part of fulfillment in ALMA, there is any way to view the last few patron accounts accessed by staff . It would be a very useful feature when carrying out certain tasks.
    By accessed by staff we mean any patron record which has been 'opened' by a member of staff on their login. On our old system we could view the last 5 patrons but even the previous 2 or 3 would be useful. We have extended the time a patron stays on the screen now but if a long query was being dealt with and the screen timed out, it would be useful to have the facility to retrieve it.

    We would be interested in knowing if, as part of fulfillment in ALMA, there is any way to view the last few patron accounts accessed by staff . It would be a very useful feature when carrying out certain tasks.
    By accessed by staff we mean any patron record which has been 'opened' by a member of staff on their login. On our old system we could view the last 5 patrons but even the previous 2 or 3 would be useful. We have extended the time a patron stays on the screen now but if a long query was… more

    3 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Fulfillment - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

14. Access Different Desks

    If you are working on a project in acquisitions and someone comes to the desk to check out a book, the acquisitions project must be scuttled in order to switch over to fulfillment. It would be great to have access to both desks at once (perhaps on different tabs) so that involved projects don't need to be randomly scuttled.

    7 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

15. Hyper link POL in the holdings list

    In the list of holdings of a BIB record, the PO Line is indicated, but it is not linked. It would be practical to have a hyperlink to get to the POL directly. The linking under "more actions" is not always very useful, because you get a list of all POL - if you have many POL for a journal, you need to remember the POL of the holding you're interested in. A hyperlink would make work easier.

    •  

    5 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Resource Management - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

16. Permit only public notes in patron files

    According to Swiss Data Protection Laws, all notes in a patron file have to be viewable by the patron.

    As consequence, we want either:
    - Only have public notes in the patron file. Non public notes do not exist. This may be an option that can be activated or deactivated by administrators.
    Or:
    - The User Viewable attribute is ticked by default. Again, this may be activated or deactivated by administrators.

    4 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  User Management  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

17. Keep user in Received Items List after Receiving a new item.

    Receive New Material - Action > Manage Items = Action > Receive.
    Why does Alma throw me out of the Received Items List, and back into the Receive New Material Screen - after I have received a new item?
    It is very inconvenient to have to click, click back into Action > Manage Items to continue working with items in this same title.
    This did not happen before last week.
    Seems to be a result of the August 2016 release?
    Please stop this automatic screen back up. I prefer to stay in the Received Items List in order to see that the receiving action worked, to review and take action on my Receiving Notes, to Receive further items, and to Edit Items that I need to withdraw -- All Before moving on to the next title.

    Receive New Material - Action > Manage Items = Action > Receive.
    Why does Alma throw me out of the Received Items List, and back into the Receive New Material Screen - after I have received a new item?
    It is very inconvenient to have to click, click back into Action > Manage Items to continue working with items in this same title.
    This did not happen before last week.
    Seems to be a result of the August 2016 release?
    Please stop this automatic screen back up. I prefer to stay in the Received Items List in order to see… more

    9 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Acquisition - Receiving  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

18. Export URL with FTP

    You can export the URL of Portfolios via Alma Admin -> Resource Management -> REsource configuration -> Configuration Menu -> Record Export -> Export URL
    But you can not do this in a sort of batch job to feed your proxy with this URL automaticly (Case 223210)

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Resource Management - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

19. Preserve the Expire Date if changed manually

    Similar to how the user group field can be preserved and not overwritten by an update to user data if it has been changed manually, it would be beneficial for the expiry date field to be treated in the same way so that if the date is changed manually it will not be overwritten by a data synchronization. This would allow staff to manage patrons locally within Alma when an external data source is unreliable.

    3 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  User Management  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team

20. vendor

    PO Line - Communications

    It is not possible to add all order communications with the vendor into one tab "Communications". All communcations that's starts from the vendor can not register here, only the communications that's starts from the library.
    It is not possible to select a communication type that's not sending a email to a vendor in the communication tab.
    It is very important for us that the chronology of communications is saved in one tab and not in many tabs.

    7 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    Closed  ·  AdminErez Shabo (Product Manager, Ex Libris) responded

    Hello All,

    This idea has been closed as part of a cleanup process for ideas older than two years with fewer than 20 votes.

    This cleanup process is necessary to streamline our idea management process and ensure that the most relevant and impactful ideas receive the attention they deserve. If you still feel strongly about this idea, you may submit it via the NERS process.

    We value your feedback and encourage you to continue submitting and voting for ideas that you believe will enhance Alma.

    Alma Product Team