Ben Hockenberry
My feedback
15 results found
-
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry supported this idea · -
68 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
81 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
2 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·Ben Hockenberry shared this idea ·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry commentedThanks, Moshe. We were looking specifically in Rialto. The dropdown doesn't have a logical sort to it-- see attachment.
Ben Hockenberry shared this idea · -
37 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
15 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry commentedGreat suggestion, Stacey, thank you!
Ben Hockenberry shared this idea · -
269 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry commentedI realize this is quite an old idea, and not specifically related to Primo VE, but for Alma/Primo VE/CDI, the addition of the Open Access facet SHOULD have done this. But oddly, links from open access records do not display to users unless an associated portfolio/collection has been activated in Alma. So the article-level open access status is shown to users, but they can't get to the content. Attached is a screenshot documenting that problem.
-
14 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
159 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
30 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
5 votesBen Hockenberry shared this idea ·
-
167 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
224 votesBen Hockenberry supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Ben Hockenberry commentedThis would be very valuable. We need to be able to create a set of physical items based on ID matches that only exist in the Title record. Thanks to Sam Nesbit for sharing one workaround, however ridiculous it is. Solutions that require multiple edits to a record and exporting and reimporting from an external system (across multiple days) should NOT be the expected workflow.
This would be a fantastic solution. Aggregator collections that primarily provide full text after issue assignment would have a checkbox set to “includes full text of preprints? No.”