veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be
My feedback
20 results found
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
15 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·
-
419 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commentedI strongly support - wish I had more votes to spend !
veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea · -
8 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commentedI fully agree, really hope this can be realized.
-
10 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea ·
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commentedI strongly support if the Idea applies to all public notes in the How to Get it section (not only for GES). Unluckily I only have 2 votes left, otherwise I would have given 3.
We are still on Primo Classic but are preparing to switch to Primo VE. We currently use html in public notes for several use cases; it's a big issue for us that the html is not interpreted in Primo VE. See also case 00957376veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea · -
295 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·
-
98 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea ·
-
34 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea ·
-
104 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea ·
-
141 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·
-
181 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·
-
794 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea · -
67 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·
-
230 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea ·
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be commentedIndeed Laura, thanks for submitting this!
veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea · -
42 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·
-
74 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be supported this idea ·
-
205 votesveerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea ·
-
80 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that this is currently not planned to be developed. We might evaluate it again in the future.
Therefore we are removing the "Under review" status for now.
Best regards,
Yael.
veerle.kerstens@kuleuven.be shared this idea ·
Yes, but if no book/journal cover is available, the digital representation should be preferred over the default icon of the Resource Type, ok ?
Some libraries do load a digital representation for items for which no cover is available, with the purpose to have a better display in Collection Discovery.